By Anuradha Warrier
Peer reviews serve a useful function not just for academic writing or scientific journals, but also for authors. For an author, those ‘peers’ are other authors – people who understand the world you draw from your imagination or the real world; the people who populate them and the internal ‘logic’ of that universe. They may tell you whether your narrative ‘flows’ – whether the plot works, whether its structure is ‘logical’ (within the universe it inhabits), whether the characters come alive, etc. Some of them may even point out grammatical errors or errors in syntax.
But… and this is a huge ‘but’ – is that enough?
The problems with peer reviews for academic writing have been well-documented. Much of it is true for writing across the board, whether your work is fiction or non-fiction.
Who is your ‘peer’?
Is this another writer, a writing group, or a trusted friend you believe will give you honest feedback? If the latter, will they point out the flaws in your writing? More importantly, do they have the experience to notice them? Most people do not have the breadth of experience needed to fully assess a work for critical issues.
The potential for bias
This leads us to the next flaw in ‘peer’ reviews: the potential for bias. When you hand your work to someone who is like you (holds the same worldview/perspective/opinions, has the same culture/upbringing, etc.), the chances are that they will not be objective enough to evaluate your work on its own merits.
Or perhaps, the person critiquing your work may want you to change characters, their motivations, even plot points because it doesn’t work for them, or because that is not how they would write.
In effect, what you’re getting is an open validation or a personal opinion. There’s nothing objective about it.
Fact checking
You cannot expect the average person to check your narrative for facts unless the subject matter happens to fall into their area of expertise.
Constructive feedback or criticism
Let us say that the person you choose to review your book is experienced, objective, and has the time to do a thorough review of your work. Will they be forthright in their feedback, or will they hold back for fear of disappointing you?
More importantly, would you be able to take their criticism in the manner in which it is intended? The danger of inviting someone close to you to critique your work is that the criticism may cut too close to the bone, even if well-intended. You know, better than anyone else, just what it is you meant to say. When someone criticises that process, it feels personal.
This is not to say that peer reviews aren’t useful to an author. They are. Peer reviews can help an author gauge how well their target demographic will receive their work. They can help you test your ideas, especially at the start of your project, before you invest time in expanding on them. They can be a huge support system while you are writing your masterpiece. And if several of your peers have the same issue with your writing, it can provide a reality check that most authors sorely need at least once in their lifetimes.
But peer reviews cannot be the only tool in a writer’s arsenal before publication, just the first step towards it.
At Blue Pencil, our professional editors can help you take your work to the next level. They have the experience to critique your work without making it about you, and to help you hone your manuscript without losing your ‘voice’. Our editors can evaluate your work and help with aspects like logic, presentation, grammar, tone, and style of writing. We offer both tough love and loving support to help you refine your manuscript to make it the best version possible.
If you need help in choosing an experienced professional editor who’s a good fit for you, contact us at hello@bluepencilpublishers.com and we’d be glad to help.
Check out our Editing Services
More to read on Blue Pencil
Self-Editing vs. Professional Editing: Making the Right Choice for Your Manuscript
The Power of a Good Book Cover Design
Why Hiring a Professional Editor Frees You Up
Print on Demand Books: The Future of Publishing
Why Do You Need a Professional Editor?